<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Seth Godin Goes Solo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rosecomm.com/book-publicity/seth-godin-goes-solo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rosecomm.com/book-publicity/seth-godin-goes-solo/</link>
	<description>Fresh Perspective, Authentic Approach, Meaningful Impact</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracey Cassidy		</title>
		<link>https://www.rosecomm.com/book-publicity/seth-godin-goes-solo/#comment-3117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracey Cassidy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prose-blog.com/?p=958#comment-3117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting insight Jonathan.  We’re currently working with a few clients that are setting up their own direct-to-consumer channels and pursuing traditional publishing houses.  I don’t think one is mutually exclusive of the other.  As you mentioned, there is still immeasurable value that comes from working with seasoned editors and publishing execs.  In fact, for aspiring authors having a substantial online audience certainly helps when trying to get an agent or publishing house to take notice of your work.   Thanks for your post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insight Jonathan.  We’re currently working with a few clients that are setting up their own direct-to-consumer channels and pursuing traditional publishing houses.  I don’t think one is mutually exclusive of the other.  As you mentioned, there is still immeasurable value that comes from working with seasoned editors and publishing execs.  In fact, for aspiring authors having a substantial online audience certainly helps when trying to get an agent or publishing house to take notice of your work.   Thanks for your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jonathan Salem Baskin		</title>
		<link>https://www.rosecomm.com/book-publicity/seth-godin-goes-solo/#comment-3043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Salem Baskin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prose-blog.com/?p=958#comment-3043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This was indeed big news, but I&#039;m not so certain that it&#039;s everything it seems to be...

Publishing is on of those &#039;authoritative institutions&#039; that&#039;s getting blown up by people connecting directly with one another. Financial institutions, media companies in general, even governments have lost a lot of their credibility. Yet what people gain from quicker, less edited engagement with one another they sometimes lose in the quality and utility of that engagement. Publishers take too long but they also review, analyze, edit, and stand behind what they publish. No amount of direct contact can replace that, per se.

There&#039;s nothing stopping &#039;middle-tier&#039; authors from engaging with their readers just like Seth proposes to do. Hell, anybody can write and distribute a book these days. The problem is that very little of it is any good, and all of the blather about &#039;content&#039; and &#039;engagement&#039; doesn&#039;t make up for it...

I&#039;m actually waiting for said authoritative institutions to rebuild their credibility and stature by helping consumers make sense of the online chaos. In this sense, Seth has just taken himself out of the conversation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was indeed big news, but I&#8217;m not so certain that it&#8217;s everything it seems to be&#8230;</p>
<p>Publishing is on of those &#8216;authoritative institutions&#8217; that&#8217;s getting blown up by people connecting directly with one another. Financial institutions, media companies in general, even governments have lost a lot of their credibility. Yet what people gain from quicker, less edited engagement with one another they sometimes lose in the quality and utility of that engagement. Publishers take too long but they also review, analyze, edit, and stand behind what they publish. No amount of direct contact can replace that, per se.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing stopping &#8216;middle-tier&#8217; authors from engaging with their readers just like Seth proposes to do. Hell, anybody can write and distribute a book these days. The problem is that very little of it is any good, and all of the blather about &#8216;content&#8217; and &#8216;engagement&#8217; doesn&#8217;t make up for it&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually waiting for said authoritative institutions to rebuild their credibility and stature by helping consumers make sense of the online chaos. In this sense, Seth has just taken himself out of the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
